You suggested that Ole Miss had a "top notch" offense, or a better offense than USM. I simply don't buy that based upon the way they escaped with their lives against Vandy. If you're suggesting that Ole Miss's offense got WORSE with time.... I'm not buying that at all. If Bama had been played the way they are now against UCLA, they'd have won. Ditto for Ole Miss, LSU, and Carolina. Tennessee is the single game that I think would have been questionable.
-----Original Message----- Please indicate to me that you didn't miss the point I was *trying* to make. It had *nothing* to do with the way OleMiss or UCLA finished the year. I try, man, I really try. Maybe I should take the Queen's advice. > -----Original Message----- > Ole Miss and UCLA didn't exactly thrill people with big wins at the end > of the year, did they? > -----Original Message----- > Hugh, if you suggesting Aubie has a top notch offense, you're just > making > yourslef look stupid. USM is a better offense than Aubie, but they were > playing in monsoon conditions, plus they had their top tailback out with > injury. Besides USM had only beaten one or two teams with a winning > record > this year. I do not consider MSU, Aubie, and USM as being in the same > offensive category as UT, LSU, OleMiss, UCLA, or Carolina. Bama's D has > been > better in the last three games, but they really haven't been tested like > they were in those earlier games. To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a BLANK subject line and the single word "UNSUBSCRIBE" (without the quotes) in the body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.net
