I got a AirForce friend of mine that they did fine.
holy crap batman what a fine.:-o 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:01 AM
To: 'BamaFanForever'; 'RollTideFan'
Subject: [RollTideFan] Music Downloads <non-bama, duh>


A 'friend' of mine sometimes downloads music from sites like Kazza. My
'friend' is worried that he, I mean, she might get arrested and forced to
pay a HuGe fine. Does anyone have any comforting words I could tell my
'friend'?

Story:
Music Industry Wins 871 Subpoenas Against Internet Users
Saturday, July 19, 2003
WASHINGTON - The music industry has won at least 871 federal subpoenas
against computer users suspected of illegally sharing music files (search)
on the Internet, with roughly 75 new subpoenas being approved each day, U.S.
court officials said Friday.
The effort represents early steps in the music industry's contentious plan
to file civil lawsuits aimed at crippling online piracy.
Subpoenas reviewed by The Associated Press show the industry compelling some
of the largest Internet providers, such as Verizon Communications Inc. and
Comcast Cable Communications Inc., and some universities to identify names
and mailing addresses for users on their networks known online by nicknames
such as "fox3j," "soccerdog33," "clover77" or "indepunk74."
The Recording Industry Association of America (search) has said it expects
to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within
the next eight weeks. U.S. copyright laws (search) allow for damages of $750
to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but the
RIAA has said it would be open to settlement proposals from defendants.
The campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring
Internet providers to readily identify subscribers suspected of illegally
sharing music and movie files. The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act
permits music companies to force Internet providers to turn over the names
of suspected music pirates upon subpoena from any U.S. District Court
clerk's office, without a judge's signature required.
In some cases, subpoenas cite as few as five songs as "representative
recordings" of music files available for downloading from these users. The
trade group for the largest music labels, the Washington-based RIAA,
previously indicated its lawyers would target Internet users who offer
substantial collections of MP3 song files but declined to say how many songs
might qualify for a lawsuit.
"We would have to look at historic trends, but that is a very high number,"
said Alan Davidson of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil
liberties group that has argued against the subpoenas. "It doesn't sound
like they're just going after a few big fish."
Music fans are fighting back with technology, using new software designed
specifically to stymie monitoring of their online activities by the major
record labels.
A new version of "Kazaa Lite," free software that provides access to the
service operated by Sharman Networks Ltd., can prevent anyone from listing
all music files on an individual's machine and purports to block scans from
Internet addresses believed to be associated with the RIAA.
Many of the subpoenas reviewed by the AP identified songs from the same few
artists, including Avril Lavigne, Snoop Dogg and Michael Jackson. It was
impossible to determine whether industry lawyers were searching the Internet
specifically for songs by these artists or whether they were commonly
popular among the roughly 60 million users of file-sharing services.
The RIAA's subpoenas are so prolific that the U.S. District Court in
Washington, already suffering staff shortages, has been forced to reassign
employees from elsewhere in the clerk's office to help process paperwork,
said Angela Caesar-Mobley, the clerk's operations manager.
The RIAA declined to comment on the numbers of subpoenas it issued.
"We are identifying substantial infringers and we're going to whatever
entity is providing (Internet) service for that potential infringer," said
Matt Oppenheim, the group's senior vice president of business and legal
affairs. "From there we'll be in a position to begin bringing lawsuits."
A spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said the
clerk's office here was "functioning more like a clearing house, issuing
subpoenas for all over the country." Any civil lawsuits would likely be
transferred to a different jurisdiction, spokeswoman Karen Redmond said.
Verizon, which has fought the RIAA over the subpoenas with continued legal
appeals, said it received at least 150 subpoenas during the last two weeks.
There were no subpoenas on file sent to AOL Time Warner Inc., the nation's
largest Internet provider and also parent company of Warner Music Group.
Earthlink Inc., another of the largest Internet providers, said it has
received only three new subpoenas.
Depaul University in Chicago was among the few colleges that received such
subpoenas; the RIAA asked Depaul on July 2 to track down a user known as
"anon39023" who was allegedly offering at least eight songs.
There was some evidence the threat of an expensive lawsuit was discouraging
online music sharing. Nielsen NetRatings, which monitors Internet usage,
earlier this week reported a decline for traffic on the Kazaa network of one
million users, with similarly large drops across other services.




______________________________________________________
RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List

"Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"

To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit
http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net

______________________________________________________
RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List

"Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"

To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit 
http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net

Reply via email to