How much you want to bet that he can overturn one or more count on appeal?
Joe
A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money.
-- G. Gordon Liddy
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ricky Mac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RollTideFan" <rtf@rolltidefan.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:26 AM
Subject: [RollTideFan] Federal Jury...



ROLL TIDE!! Rick

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/sports/columns/050203b.shtml

MARK EDWARDS

Federal jury hits against Alabama, too

It's getting tougher to argue that the NCAA Committee on Infractions
shouldn't have penalized Alabama's football program.

If you want to question the fairness of the penalties Alabama received
two years and two days ago, that's a valid point. If you want to argue
Tennessee's role in Alabama's case, that's another good point.

If you want to complain about whether the NCAA should investigate the
Vols, well, only those looking through orange-shaded glasses would pipe
up about that one. Tennessee should be in line for its turn on the NCAA
carousel that seems to catch up to every SEC school, except Vanderbilt.

But Wednesday's verdict in Alabama booster Logan Young's federal trial
only adds to the validity of the Committee on Infractions' decision in
the Alabama case.

A federal jury of seven women and five men apparently believed that
Young paid $150,000 to secure the services of Memphis-Trezevant High
defensive lineman Albert Means for the Alabama football team. They
convicted Young of all counts he faced, including conspiracy to commit
racketeering, crossing state lines to commit racketeering and
structuring a financial transaction to evade reporting requirements.

The star witness against Young was Means' high school coach, Lynn Lang,
who said he negotiated the amount.

However, it doesn't seem as if Lang's testimony got Young. Just like in
the Alabama case, this didn't boil down to the word of one untrustworthy
high school coach.

Instead, it was bank and phone records.

Prosecutors presented 13 different instances in which Young made large
withdrawals from his bank and within a reasonable amount of time Lang
made large deposits in his own account. Prosecutors also showed where
Lang and Young kept in touch consistently by telephone.

Lang's testimony alone wouldn't have been enough to convict Young. Why
should anybody believe a coach who was asking for as much as $200,000 to
direct his star player to a certain school?

He's been caught in lies before, and even the prosecutors warned
beforehand that he's not a paragon of virtue. Young's lawyers didn't
appear to have any trouble presenting witnesses who contradicted parts
of Lang's testimony.

But Lang apparently wasn't needed to convict Young.

The NCAA didn't rely upon him, either. In fact, the enforcement staff
never spoke with him officially. In the report on Alabama's case, the
enforcement staff said that Lang declined to be interviewed "on advice
of counsel."

Whether the bank and phone records were reason enough for a federal jury
to convict Young is an issue worth raising.

The phone records presented in Young's trial came after Means signed
with Alabama in 2000. Also, the bank records are circumstantial. Young's
accountant testified that they don't prove that Young gave Lang the
money he deposited.

In the NCAA case, Alabama explained Young's withdrawals by saying that
it isn't unusual for a man of his wealth to take out that much money
that often.

However, when applying this to Alabama's case, it's still awfully
damning. Also, remember that the $150,000 violation accounted for only
one of the 12 in which the Crimson Tide was convicted.

That violation added to the Committee on Infractions' belief that the
Tide was fostering a booster culture, and Young's federal case only
appears to confirm that.

Again, if you want to argue the fairness of Alabama's NCAA penalties, go
right ahead. You've got plenty of evidence, especially the recent
Michigan basketball case.

Even though Michigan's violations appeared at least as questionable as
Alabama's, the Wolverines were banned from postseason play only one
year, instead of two like the Crimson Tide. Also, it came in a year in
which Michigan wasn't expected to make the NCAA tournament anyway.
Michigan's scholarship reductions weren't nearly as damaging as
Alabama's, either.

But none of this changes what a federal jury confirmed Wednesday — the
NCAA enforcement staff was right to be suspicious of Alabama and booster
Logan Young.



_______________________________________________
RTF mailing list
RTF@rolltidefan.net
http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net



_______________________________________________ RTF mailing list RTF@rolltidefan.net http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net

Reply via email to