Hi all,
This document has passed adoption as BFD WG document.
Usual practice would be to resubmit as draft-ietf-bfd-authentication, however
that could be a bit confusing. How about
draft-ietf-bfd-authentication-optimization or
draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication?
Regards,
Jeff & Reshad.
From: Rtg-bfd <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on
behalf of Reshad <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 7:03 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication
BFD WG members,
Please indicate to the WG mailing list whether you would support or not support
BFD WG adoption of the following document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/
Authors, as was mentioned at IETF94, you should get your proposal reviewed by
the security group.
Regards,
Jeff & Reshad.
--- Begin Message ---
The IETF WG state of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication has been changed to
"Adopted by a WG" from "Candidate for WG Adoption" by Reshad Rahman:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/
Comment:
Adopted as BFD WG doc
--- End Message ---
