Think there was some discussion during the extension of the charter for this work item. Not sure what the conclusion was exactly. IIRC, we found the cool term 'seamless' and tried to fit in SBFD work into that definition, rather than finding a term fitting the definition.
Not sure if stateless is complete enough, but I have no opinion either way. On the contrary, someone asked if S means SDN :D Sam Sent from my iPhone > On May 2, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does it make sense to change "seamless BFD" with "stateless BFD" in the > documents? Its very convoluted to explain whats "seamless" about S-BFD. > > We called it "seamless" because it was simple and largely stateless. > > Any suggestions? > > Cheers, Manav
