Greg, you've been given timeslots for these. Note that I've put the 5884 bis topic at the front of the agenda since it ties into existing WG work.
-- Jeff On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:58:02PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote: > Hi Jeff, Reshad, et. al, > thank you for the opportunity to present and discuss new BFD works in > London. I'd like to propose the following topics: > > - use of BFD Demand mode in BFD over MPLS p2p LSP (based on > draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand); > - non-IP encapsulation of BFD control packet over p2mp MPLS LSP (based > on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd) > - use of BFD in MPLS-SR (based of draft-mirsky-spring-bfd) > - use of p2mp BFD over shared-media, e.g. Ethernet, segment (VRRP and > PIM-SM) (based on draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case and > draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case) > - and, last but not least, clarification of BFD bootstrap by LSP ping > over MPLS p2p LSP and interest in RFC5884bis (based on > draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify) > > Regards, > Greg > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Working Group, > > > > BFD has requested a meeting slot for IETF 101 in London. IETF is little > > over a month away. > > > > This is a call for topics for our session. Even if you think you've > > requested a slot, please respond in thread so all can see the request for > > discussion on the topic. > > > > As is our tradition, please try to reserve requests for timeslots for > > DISCUSSION, rather than simply a powerpoint update on a diff between two > > versions of the draft. > > > > -- Jeff & Reshad > > > >
