> On Oct 27, 2025, at 1:56 PM, John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Waiting on datatracker to open again. > > Peanut gallery says: or Ketan could approve manual posting if you > collectively think it’s worth it. (As in, lets him approve the document > before IETF week starts and he gets swamped with demands.) Consider this IESG state compression. I had thought we were caught up and done. Again. Let's see if anything else trickles in before publish. Meanwhile, the changes aren't such they should hold up WG polling. -- Jeff
- Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Evaluation Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Evaluation Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Evaluat... John Scudder
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Eva... Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG... Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Evaluation Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Evaluat... Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG Eva... Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: Status of 3 BFD documents in IESG... Ketan Talaulikar
- WG poll - objections to progressing BFD authentic... Jeffrey Haas
- Re: WG poll - objections to progressing BFD a... Reshad Rahman
- Re: WG poll - objections to progressing B... Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: WG poll - objections to progressi... Rahman
- Re: WG poll - objections to prog... Mahesh Jethanandani
