Hi: This draft responds to a suggestion by Stewart during the RTGWG meeting in Atlanta. Stewart suggested that we leave a written record on the presentation comparing ARC and MRT. Since both technical solutions are subject to changes, this work can only be a snapshot that represent the best understanding/ knowledge of the authors at that particular time.
It is unclear to the author whether we should maintain this document overtime or just clean it up and publish with proper caution words. What do you think? Pascal -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: lundi 21 janvier 2013 00:12 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Cc: [email protected] Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt Revision: 00 Title: Available Routing Constructs Creation date: 2013-01-21 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 18 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00 Abstract: This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in order to support applicability statements. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
