It would be excellent to see progress on the Remote LFA draft and on merging at least the two drafts that describe how to do node-protection for Remote LFA before the Vancouver IETF.
Alia On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]> wrote: > hi jeff, > > the single biggest problem with draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa > is that it leaves a lot of ambiguity how to implement certain > functionality - node-protection, manageability among them. > > 'the right thing'(™) would be to fix the rlfa spec, > which somehow seems not possible, so it remains > in the state which it is now … what i call 'underspecified'. > > draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection is a contribution > coming from a dev-team which had to implement this for > OSPF and IS-IS and make it work altogether. > > we got the impression that customers want to use both > node-protection *and* manageability together and as such > you need to do things a certain way which is described in > the draft. IMO thats a bit more than just > 'implementation details' but rather a guidance > how to get this right. therefore the intended status is > 'proposed standard'. > > /hannes > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Question to the authors of the draft about their intentions, obviously > the > > basic node protection equation(D_opt(Npq, Dst) < D_opt(Npq, Np) + > > Distance_opt(Np, Dst)) is correct, however the rest is more or less > > implementation details. > > So if the authors would like to share the details about their > > implementation should not the Intended Status be Informational? > > > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > > >>> > >>>> Folks, > >>>> > >>>> Does anyone know whether the draft deal will be treated in the IETF > 88? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Rogerio Mariano > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> View this message in context: > >>>> > http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/Request-for-review-draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa > >>>> - > >>>> n > >>>> ode-protection-01-txt-tp375714p386321.html > >>>> Sent from the IETF - Rtgwg mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> rtgwg mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > >>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rtgwg mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
