Alia,

We should send a heads up to MPLS and CCAMP.  Would you please do that as WG 
chair.

Curtis


Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]>
Sent from my tablet so please disregard sloppy typing.

Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:

>This second WG Last Call got absolutely no comments.
>Does this group of generally opinionated and thoughtful people truly have
>nothing to say?
>If so and given the previous WGLC succeeded, then on Oct 9, I will take
>silence as consent and indicate that on the draft shepherd's write-up...
>
>Alia
>
>
>On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is to start a second Working Group Last Call on
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-11. As you may recall, we successfully
>> completed a WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10.  After that,
>> there was concern about the use of ITU terminology (composite-link and NPO)
>> where the draft was not actually using the exact meaning specified by the
>> ITU.
>>
>> Therefore, it was decided to return the draft to the WG for a quick
>> terminology update (and also to address some other review comments).
>>
>> This WGLC will end on September 30.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alia
>>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to