Support - as co-author
This document has information in a few areas that for clarity we would
have to put in other documents if it were not here:
1. The two fundamental use cases - parallel simple links and
parallel paths (plus links).
2. Some uses of the advanced features -
a. delay sesitive applications,
b. accounting for IP and LDP traffic
c. packet ordering considerations
3. Common practice today. (the appendices)
Rather than put some of this in a few other documents and clutter them
it is better to have a purely informational document that we can
reference.
Without the background information on common practice we have to refer
to some older documents like RFC299{1,2} and the PW avoiding ECMP RFC
[RFC4928] that are inadequate for that background information.
Curtis
In message <cf23ab10.4bd19%[email protected]>
"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> This message starts the Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases. This call will close by EOD (pick your
> favorite time zone) on February 28, 2014.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
>
> Please provide specific feedback as to why you support (or not) the
> advancement of this draft. Please about "+1"-type responses.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
