Support in principle.. Will post detailed comments later. But ..
1. Would like to definitely see IPR claims on this 2. It's important to note, this is adding additional complexity into the system on OTO rLFA and it's not yielding any/very-minimal gain for 60-70% of topologies and remaining 30% it's giving around ~10-12% coverage gain. -- Uma C. From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana) Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:02 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection Hi! During the meeting in London the authors asked for the WG to adopt this draft. This message officially starts the call for adoption for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection. Please indicate your position about adopting it by end-of-day on March 28, 2014. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
