On 6/17/14 8:21 AM, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <[email protected]> wrote:
Clarence: Hi! >As explicitly stated in the text, this approach is closely related >to RFC6976 on which Cisco has already declared IPR. If you require >a specific disclosure on this draft we will initiate this. >We await your instructions. The text is not really clear about the relationship being that close. In fact, it mentions rfc6976 in the "other solutions" section, which may make not be apparent to the casual reader that there is IPR on this draft. So..if you believe the IPR from rfc6976 also applies to this draft, then yes, please disclose it specifically. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
