Hi Tony, On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Antoni Przygienda < [email protected]> wrote:
> > hi antoni, > > > > i am all for accepting it as a WG item - IMO its an excellent proofpoint > that > > really large datacenters can be run based on exisiting protocols and > > [Tony said] Hannes, yepp, first, work's interesting & fact that it works > gives it its own merit, should be possibly taken up by someone IMO. My > points were though: > > 1. I didn't see 'running large datacenters' as something on RTGWG > charter and it's also typically something that is first driven by larger > set of requirements rather than a single datapoint. > As I said earlier, this falls into the other work and handling individual drafts without a home. It's a way of getting the review and consensus for drafts that would otherwise be AD-sponsored. I agree that this is a change from how rtgwg has been used in the past. > 2. A blueprint of a particular solution is exactly that. It is > not a generic protocol specification or guideline that will fi t e'one. If > you have multi-TS which bring their own existing addresses or need MAC > mobility or have to run L2 applications or don't have BGP implementation > with necessary twists or other tid-nits which tons of DC happen to carry > about then the shoe may not fit. Absolutely - this is a starting point that gives one idea. > > even getting to 10000s of routing nodes is not the end of the world. > > > [Tony said] We know that from a running thing called the 'Internet' ;-P > I know I took it out the context but I couldn't resist the tongue-in-cheek > pun possible ;-) > > Again, looking fwd' to presentation and discussion on the floor. > Please - start the discussion here and now! I was delighted to see how many people were clearly familiar with the work and thought it was a good idea to discuss. Let's get some good reviews and suggestions so the draft can be much better before the next IETF. Alia > --- tony > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
