The chairs have asked me to solicit review and commentary on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases "Requirements and Use Cases for Source/Destination Routing", Fred Baker, 2014-10-21
There are at least two layers of discussion. One, as a working group, do we agree that there is a problem to solve here? I obviously think there is, but I am one voice. Two, if the draft were to become a working group draft, what would need to be added or changed?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
