> On Mar 24, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems to me that most use cases for ipv6 multi-homing with > provider-assigned addresses only need to route based on source address when > the destination prefix is the default route. So why not require that source > prefixes can only be paired up with the default destination prefix ::/0?
When what one has in mind is an egress route, that probably makes sense. However, it precludes an entire class of use cases mentioned in the use case draft. Why do that?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
