Hi Alia, Many many thanks for the comments.
Regarding your comment on an example with multiple ecmp primary next-hop nodes, is it okay if we include it as a separate section? I do have an example in mind, but am not sure including it directly in the problem statement will complicate it for the readers to understand it, or not. I will wait for your suggestion on the above. :) Thanks and regards, -Pushpasis On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > As is customary, I have done my AD review of > draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08. > First, I would like to thank the authors - Pushpasis, Shraddha, Chris, > Hannes, and Stephane - for their work on this well-written document. > > I do not have any substantial comments from my review, so I am happy to > request an IETF Last Call on this and have scheduled it for the Jan 19 IESG > telechat. > > My one comment is that it would be useful to have a slightly larger clear > example where the primary path has multiple ECMP next-hop nodes. This can > be a point of complexity and is not really described clearly as such. > > Thanks, > Alia >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
