Thanks Alia – I’ve fixed these as well as a couple other typos in –14.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM
To: Routing WG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-13
Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Yingzhen Qu 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Acee Lindem 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Christian Hopps 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM

As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-13. 
First, I would like to thank Xufeng, Yingzhen, Acee, Chris, and Lou and the 
RTGWG for their work on this draft.  It is a very well-written, clear, and 
useful pair of models.

I did find a few nits to be fixed in the next version. I am putting this into 
IETF Last Call and scheduling it for the telechat on 10/12

Nits:

1) Sec 2 ipv6-route-target: s/only they IPv6 Address/only they are IPv6 Address

2)Sec 2 ipv6-route-origin: s/Origin for Routng and/Origin for Routing and

Regards,
Alia
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to