I support this document to the next stage.
But I have some comments (10+ minor comments + few nits) and I definetely see one more revision needed before WGLC complete. I shared my shepherd review comments with autthors. -- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 7:41 AM To: RTGWG <[email protected]> Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo. There was consensus that document is ready for the last call and the authors have addressed all the comments from RTGDIR review. Please indicate support or no-support by December 14, 2017. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff & Chris _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
