Thanks for the pointer to draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths. Agree it describes local protection for SR-TE paths better..
But, just wondering whether the data plane complexity is worth compared to provisioning disjoint end-to-end SR-TE backup path together with S-BFD.. Regards, Muthu On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Alexander Vainshtein <vinesa...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Muthu, > Please take a look at > > draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths that provides accurate > descriprion of the requured DP behavior in the standard terms > (context-specifuc label spaces and context-identifying labels). > > My 2c. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:54, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal > <muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
