Hi Xufeng,
Hi Benoit and all,
We used to have a full tree as Section 3, in the revision 02. We received some
comment to move it to an appendix. We are fine with moving it back to the main
body, if no more objections.
to be decided with your AD.
Regards, Benoit
Thanks,
- Xufeng
-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:53 AM
To: The IESG <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Yingzhen Qu
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with
COMMENT)
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have to refer to an appendix to find the full tree diagram.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A, with no
forward reference. Why don't you have the full tree in a new section, as you did
in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08#section-3
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
