Hi Adam, We have posted an update https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-10, to change the example to use IPv6 instead of IPv4.
Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Roach [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 12:50 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Yingzhen Qu > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with > COMMENT) > > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please consider updating the example in appendix B to conform to the IAB > guidance found at <https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/>. > This would involve changing the example to use IPv6 instead of IPv4, or adding > an > IPv6 example in addition to the IPv4 example. > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
