Greg, I think that your request can be honored. Assuming that the draft progresses at some point in the future, I would still request that you respond to the IPR poll along with the authors and contributors. Thanks, Chris
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:01 AM Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Authors, WG Chairs, et al., > my request may sound unusual at first so I'll try to explain how and why > I've decided to do it. > Firstly, after the part that defines the use of p2mp BFD (now RFC 8562) > was removed because of IPR concerns, there's no substantive contribution of > mine in the document. Secondly, I believe that the use of RFC 8562 to > support sub-second convergence in VRRP is simpler, easier to deploy than > the one based on RFC 5880 And lastly, the draft expired and had not been > progressed in quite some time. > In case RTGWG WG will be interested in developing the solution based on > RFC 8562 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case/>, > authors are ready and committed to working on it. > > Regards, > Greg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
