Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS. I think the disclaimer in Section 6 about
default address selection is sufficient to address remaining concerns about the
use of the term "host" throughout Section 6. I think Section 6 might be
slightly improved if the section headings that talk about "source address
selection" instead said "default source address selection."

I agree with the Gen-ART reviewer that a forward reference to Section 8.3 in
the last sentence of Section 6.7.1 would be useful.


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to