Hi Alissa, This liaison statement is well received, thank you.
BBF, this has been added to Jira as LIAISE-355 <https://issues.broadband-forum.org/browse/LIAISE-355>. Thank you. April *April Nowicki* Member Support Manager Broadband Forum Office: +1 303 664 4507 Mobile: +1 904 377 8037 On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:22 AM Liaison Statement Management Tool < [email protected]> wrote: > Title: IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the > disaggregated BNG architecture' > Submission Date: 2019-11-21 > URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1662/ > > From: Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>,The IETF Chair <[email protected]>, > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > Response Contacts: The IETF Chair <[email protected]> > Technical Contacts: [email protected] > Purpose: In response > > Referenced liaison: Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG > architecture (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1615/) > > Referenced liaison: Response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work > related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1619/) > > Referenced liaison: Follow-on response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG > work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1631/) > > Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work > related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/) > > Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work > related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/) > > Body: The IETF thanks the Broadband Forum for your two liaisons both > titled, "Follow-on to IETF liaison: 'Potential RTGWG work related to the > disaggregated BNG architecture'" ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/ and > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/). We appreciate the Broadband > Forum's responsive action on this important topic and your work to keep the > IETF apprised of your progress, including sharing the draft document with > details of the ongoing work. > > The two liaisons and draft document were recently discussed within the > IESG. Our conclusion from the liaisons and information provided, is that > the Broadband Forum's selection of 3GPP's PFCP protocol for use between the > DBNG Control Plane (CP) and User Plane (UP) indicates there is no current > need for the IETF to develop a protocol to address this use case. > Consequently, and in the spirit of cooperation and maintaining the cordial, > productive relationship between our two organizations, consideration of all > IETF work related to Disaggregated BNG suspended in March will not be > resumed. > > Should the Broadband Forum require assistance from the IETF on this topic > going forward, please inform the relevant IETF Area(s) via liaison and we > will consider the request accordingly. We look forward to our continued > work with the Broadband Form, in particular on the many other topics where > our two organizations are cooperating. > > Sincerely, > Alissa Cooper > IETF Chair, on behalf of the IESG > Attachments: > > No document has been attached > > -- > Please go to > https://wiki.broadband-forum.org/display/BBF/Join+or+Leave+BBF+Groups+and+Email+Lists > to manage your email subscriptions, or email [email protected] > for assistance. > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
