Dave, On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:35:12PM +0000, Dave Katz wrote: > If BFD’s transport semantics are that interesting, someone could take a > week and whip up a transport that looks rather like BFD but is properly > suited for the purpose. That would make all of these issues go away, and > would provide a common mechanism that could be used more broadly, and > someone would have an RFC to be proud of.
That's effectively what the discussion needs to be. And I agree, there's plumbing like demand and echo that can be gotten rid of. The adaptive timers are part of the charm that people seem to like, so I suspect that'd still be a thing people want. Just not necessarily 3ms granularity. :-) > I guess the irony of all of this is that when the BFD WG was formed it was > expected to be the shortest-lived WG in history. Now I suspect it’s going > for a record in the other direction. ;-) I still resent Alex Z. and co. for leading me into that trap. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
