Hi Linda, I'll add this to the agenda.
Thanks, Yingzhen On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:37 AM Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we have 10 minutes to brief the following drafts? > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis/ > > > > We have made significant changes to address the comment and suggestions > from IETF106, email discussions and other IETF WGs. > > We have removed all reference to SD-WAN from those two drafts, making the > drafts primarily focusing on the problems and gaps of networks to connect > enterprise premises with hybrid cloud data centers. > > > > To make it easier for people to provide feedback, we added a Gap Summary > section to draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis > > > > Here is the summary of the technical gaps discussed in this document: > > - For Accessing Cloud Resources > > a) When a remote vCPE can be reached by multiple PEs of one > provider VPN network, it is not straightforward to designate which egress > PE to the remote vCPE based on applications > > b) Need automated and reliable tools to map the user-friendly > (natural language) access rules into machine readable policies and to > provide interfaces for enterprises to self-manage policy enforcement points > for their own workloads. > > c) NAT Traversal. An enterprise’s network controller needs to > be informed of the NAT properties for its workloads in Cloud DCs. If the > workloads are attached to the enterprise’s own vCPEs instantiated in the > Cloud DCs, the task can be achieved. > > d) The multicast traffic to/from remote vCPE needs a feature > like Appointed Forwarder specified by TRILL to prevent multicast data > frames from looping around. > > e) BGP between PEs and remote CPEs via untrusted networks. > > f) Traffic Path Management > > - Overlay Edge Node’s WAN Port Management: BGP UPDATE propagate client’s > routes information, but don’t distinguish network facing ports. > > - Aggregating VPN paths and Internet paths > > a) Control Plane for Overlay over Heterogeneous Networks is not > clear. > > b) BGP UPDATE Messages missing properties: > > - Lacking SD-WAN Segments Identifier > > - Missing attributes in Tunnel-Encap > > c) SECURE-L3VPN/EVPN is not enough > > d) Missing clear methods in preventing attacks from > Internet-facing ports > > > > > > > > We are hoping for WGLC for the drafts. > > Linda Dunbar > > > > *From:* rtgwg <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Yingzhen Qu > *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2020 11:26 PM > *To:* [email protected]; rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]> > *Subject:* IETF 108 RTGWG Presentation Slot Requests > > > > Hi all, > > > > We're now accepting agenda request for the RTGWG Working Grouping meeting > IETF 108. Please send your requests to [email protected] > <[email protected]> indicating draft name, speaker, and desired > duration (covering presentation and discussion). > > > > RTGWG session is scheduled on Tuesday, July 28th, 14:10-15:50 UTC. > > > > Thanks, > > Yingzhen >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
