From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Sent: 06 July 2020 01:19
I think that the reference to bgp-model in this I-D has to be Normative. Both
in the example of how the YANG might be used by a protocol and in the examples,
the text only works if the bgp-model remains as it is now - if the structure
changes, then those two parts of this I-D become a nonsense.
Tom Petch
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy Management
Authors : Yingzhen Qu
Jeff Tantsura
Acee Lindem
Xufeng Liu
Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-17.txt
Pages : 41
Date : 2020-07-05
Abstract:
This document defines a YANG data model for configuring and managing
routing policies in a vendor-neutral way and based on actual
operational practice. The model provides a generic policy framework
which can be augmented with protocol-specific policy configuration.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model/
There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-17
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-17
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-17
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
