On Jul 7, 2020, at 11:35 AM, John G. Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Acee,
On Jul 7, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: Yes. I’d say we should just use the ip-prefix type from RFC 6021. This type has the right semantics. However, I’m wondering how we do the mask-length-lower checking with the union. I imagine it should be possible. How would you test the constraint on mask-length-upper if you use ip-prefix? Duh, that’s what you said, s/upper/lower/. I don’t see a way to do it, but if you can work it out I agree it otherwise seems like the right approach. —John
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
