Hi Chris, I agree and will make the changes tomorrow. Thanks, Acee From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Chris Bowers <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 4:50 PM To: Routing WG <[email protected]>, rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
RTGWG, An objection has been raised with respect to requesting publication of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model at this time. The main concern expressed is that changes in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model may require changes in draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model. The main area of concern is the text in section 7 of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model, which illustrates how the current version of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model augments rpol:defined-sets, rpol:conditions, and rpol:actions with bp:bgp-defined-sets, bp:bgp-conditions, and bp:bgp-actions. I would like to suggest adding the following text to section 7 to make it clear that this text is not normative. ================= The example below provides an illustration of how another data model can augment parts of this routing policy data model. It uses specific examples from draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09 to show in a concrete manner how the different pieces fit together. This example is not normative with respect to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model. ================= Would this text, or something similar, help to address this concern? Thanks, Chris On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:45 PM Chris Bowers <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: RTGWG, This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model. Please indicate support for, or opposition to, the publication of this document as Proposed Standard, along with the reasoning behind that support or opposition. Jeff Tantsura is a co-author of the document, so he won't be involved in judging consensus. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. This WG last call will end on September 2, 2020. Thanks, Chris
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
