send .ics too many time zones ;-) -- tny
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 1:36 PM Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Adrian -- maybe this is the first “IETF virtual interim side > meeting” ;-) > On 9/18/2021 7:11 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi Lou, > > > > Yes, it’s just something that Dan and I put together in the context of our > work at https://github.com/danielkinguk/sarah/ > > Our aim is, periodically, to bring together some key research work on or > related to routing and addressing that we think would be of benefit to > IETFers and others in the field. At the same time, we want to try to > trigger discussion about the nature of research into routing and > addressing, and uncover some of the important questions that are not always > given enough attention. > > > > I think the side meeting is reasonably established (at IETF meetings), but > they are meetings of convenience and, while they typically carry the IETF > contributors’ rules, they are not formally part of the IETF. > > > > But I am unclear on the feasibility of “IETF virtual interim side > meetings”. > > > > So, what we are doing is having a small workshop (just 90 minutes) > following much of the same procedure as would happen at an IETF side > meeting, but it is not an IETF meeting. > > > > Nevertheless, I have a slide that begins… > > Note Well – This is *Not* an IETF meeting > > But let’s apply IETF policies for patents and code of conduct in this > meeting > > …and then goes on to the usual BCP79 material etc. > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > *From:* routing-discussion <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Lou Berger > *Sent:* 18 September 2021 11:50 > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > *Cc:* 'King, Daniel' <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Security in the > Internet > > > > Hi Adrian > > Interesting stuff! > > > (Please note, this is not an IETF/IRTF meeting, but we thought the > IETF/IRTF community would be interested.) > > Who is the sponsoring organization for this meeting? > > If just you and Dan, why not just run it as an IETF interim with rules > (e.g. IPR) we all understand? > > Thanks, > Lou > > ---------- > On September 16, 2021 6:19:30 AM Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > We've put together a small workshop on Evolving Routing Security in the > Internet to be held on Thursday 30th September at 3pm UTC [1] > > Our objective is to bring relevant information and research to the routing > community and spark discussion about routing research. > > Attendance is open and free. > > Meeting materials will be at > > https://github.com/danielkinguk/sarah/tree/main/conferences/security-worksho > p > > We will use Webex : > > https://htf-paris.my.webex.com/htf-paris.my-en/j.php?MTID=mc8bb1a7bcda855d14 > 060678f65272117 and stream the meeting on YouTube at > https://youtu.be/V9CZC42BTDc > > Our agenda for this meeting features three presentations and a period for > open discussion. > * Mutually Agreed Norms for Routing Security > Andrei Robachevsky, Internet Society > * Lightweight blockchain assisted secure routing of swarm UAS networking > Houbing Song and Jian Wang, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University > * On-Demand Blind Packet Forwarding > Irfan Simsek, University of Duisburg-Essen > > We hope you can fit this into your schedule. > > (Please note, this is not an IETF/IRTF meeting, but we thought the > IETF/IRTF > community would be interested.) > > Best, > Adrian and Dan > > [1] > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210930T150000&p1 > =1440&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_et&p4=tz_bst&p5=tz_cest&p6=tz_cst-china > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
