Hi Fred, Sorry for the late response.
Among all three documents, only the “atn-bgp” is a RTGWG WG document, the other two belong to 6man and should progress in 6man. I’ll start requesting some directorate reviews after IETF 112. Dear WG: Please review and comment while we prepare for the last call of this draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp/ Thank, Jeff and Yingzhen On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:11 AM Templin (US), Fred L < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeff and Yingzhen, > > At IETF111, we had a 60min timeslot for AERO and OMNI with an examination > of > the following three documents: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-aero/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-omni/ > > The first document concerning the BGP-based routing service is a working > group > document of rtgwg, and I believe it is time to issue a working group last > call. The > second (AERO) and third (OMNI) documents are now done pending IETF input > and ready for progression as RFCs. > > Together, these documents offer a promising solution for the future of > mobile > Internet routing. I believe it should interest this group to study the > documents > and take them up as work items, and I welcome any comments or questions. > > Fred Templin > > --- > Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]>| Fri, 29 October 2021 05:44 > UTC|Show header > Hi all, > > The draft agenda has been uploaded: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/session/rtgwg > > Please take a look and let us know if any changes are needed. > > Presenters, > Please provide your slides as early as possible. > > Thanks, > Jeff and Yingzhen > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
