[Removed rfc-editor.]

I agree with Acee.  I’m marking this report as rejected.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On February 10, 2022 at 12:30:35 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) ([email protected])
wrote:

This is a rather subjective comment since at this YANG data node is, in
fact, a list. There are many models that follow this format even it seems a
bit verbose in the xml examples. Also, it is a moot point since changing
this would be a non-backward compatible YANG change. Please reject this
Errata.
Thanks,
Acee

On 2/10/22, 12:20 PM, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]>
wrote:

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9067,
"A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6845

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Kris Lambrechts <[email protected]>

Section: 7.2.

Original Text
-------------
list prefix-list {
key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
description
"List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
uses prefix;
}


Corrected Text
--------------
list prefix {
key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
description
"List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
uses prefix;
}


Notes
-----
The name of this list is not natural and makes instance data hard to read.
This is very apparent in the example in Appendix B. Policy Examples

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9067 (draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-31)
--------------------------------------
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy
Publication Date : October 2021
Author(s) : Y. Qu, J. Tantsura, A. Lindem, X. Liu
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Routing Area Working Group
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to