Hi all,

 

I support the creation of this APN working group, and I would like to 
contribute on the related work. 




Yours Sincerely,

Yichi Xu.




On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:15 PM Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> wrote:


Dear RTGWG,

 

 

APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the

documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic needs

collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are

within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.

 

RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of 
different options and one option for handling

such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. 

The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus 
WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the 
group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.

 

We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments about

existing APN documents should be sent to [email protected].  This thread focuses on

support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a

new WG.

 

Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.

Thanks!

 

 

Cheers,

Yingzhen  Jeff

 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to