Dear All, The updated and new CAN/dyncast drafts were posted.
New version of problem statement, use cases, gap analysis and requirements, which were updated according to the BoF discussion and addressed some of the issues: draft-liu-dyncast-ps-usecases-04 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-dyncast-ps-usecases/), updated the problem statement and use cases. draft-liu-dyncast-gap-reqs-00 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-dyncast-gap-reqs/), was replaced with draft-liu-dyncast-reqs, which added the gap analysis and updated requirements. draft-li-dyncast-architecture-04 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-dyncast-architecture/), addressed some issues in the BoF. New draft of computing resource modeling, which describes the architecture of modeling and the considered usage in CAN： draft-liu-can-computing-resource-modeling-00 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-can-computing-resource-modeling/) Please check and review them if you are interested in, the co authors welcome any comments and suggestions. Thanks. Regards, Peng [email protected]
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
