Hi Dhruv, From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 9:07 AM To: Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> Cc: Routing WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Working Group Adoption Call for draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-11
Hi, I support adoption. Now that we are doing bis, could we improve the IANA section a bit -- it would help to identify the registry and explicit instructions to update the references, for instance. Also for ethernet, isn't IPv4 allocation missing -> "00-01-00 to 00-01-FF"? I agree. I’ve updated as Donald suggested with a bit more information. Section "11.2.6. 0 - Reserved" and the VRP packet with the field being called "0" but the description as "This reserved field MUST be set to zero..." reads wrong. I suggest either using "reserved" in the figure and section title or just using MBZ - must be zero and not call it reserved. I renamed the field to “Reserve”, it can’t be “Reserved” since it is only 7 characters for the 4-bit field. Thanks, Acee Thanks! Dhruv On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 8:23 AM Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear RTGWG, This email begins a working group adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/ Please indicate your support or objections by July 17th, 2022. Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.. Thanks, Yingzhen _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
