Hi, (I am not Yujing, but since I gave a few inputs to the draft…)
> On 2 Feb 2023, at 23:50, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yujing, > > Reading through your draft, I am not sure if the computing on the path is to > be performed by the routers in the network? Or the service functions attached > to the routers? > I think that the idea is that the operations can be done by any on-path device being able and has thee resources to perform the operation. > The NetReduce function is pretty sophisticated, can’t be done by today’s > routers. > That is true. But AFAICT the draft does not go into the specifics of the operations. So, there are certainly complex/heavy operations that cannot be performed on-path. But this is orthogonal to the draft itself. > If the function is performed by the Service Functions that chained together > to perform the on path computation, is the signal your draft proposed about > the signaling among those service functions? > SFC is just an example, but yes SINC is supposed to signal what to do with the specific packet. Ciao L. > Thanks, > > Linda > > > > > > > > "zhouyujing (A)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Fri, 28 October 2022 08:37 UTCShow header > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/?q=draft-zhou-sfc-sinc> > Hi all, > > We submitted a new draft about In-Network Computing > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-sfc-sinc/). In this draft, we > want to discuss a mechanism "Signaling In-Network Computing operations" > (SINC) to enable in-packet operation signaling for in-network computing for > specific scenarios. > > Hope to get your review and comments. > > Many thanks! > > Best, > Yujing Zhou > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
