The version includes RTGDIR and OpsDir comments from Ben Niven-Jenkins and Tim Chown.
Thanks, Acee > On Mar 6, 2023, at 8:44 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of > the IETF. > > Title : Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 > for IPv4 and IPv6 > Authors : Acee Lindem > Aditya Dogra > Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-03.txt > Pages : 43 > Date : 2023-03-06 > > Abstract: > This document defines version 3 of the Virtual Router Redundancy > Protocol (VRRP) for IPv4 and IPv6. It is based on VRRP (version 2) > for IPv4 that is defined in RFC 3768 and in "Virtual Router > Redundancy Protocol for IPv6”, and obsoletes the prevision > specification of this version documented in RFC 5798. VRRP specifies > an election protocol that dynamically assigns responsibility for a > virtual router to one of the VRRP routers on a LAN. The VRRP router > controlling the IPv4 or IPv6 address(es) associated with a virtual > router is called the VRRP Active Router, and it forwards packets sent > to these IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. VRRP Active Routers are configured > with virtual IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, and VRRP Backup Routers infer > the address family of the virtual addresses being advertised based on > the IP protocol version. Within a VRRP router, the virtual routers > in each of the IPv4 and IPv6 address families are independent of one > another and always treated as separate virtual router instances. The > election process provides dynamic failover in the forwarding > responsibility should the Active Router become unavailable. For > IPv4, the advantage gained from using VRRP is a higher-availability > default path without requiring configuration of dynamic routing or > router discovery protocols on every end-host. For IPv6, the > advantage gained from using VRRP for IPv6 is a quicker switchover to > Backup Routers than can be obtained with standard IPv6 Neighbor > Discovery mechanisms. > > The VRRP terminology has been updated conform to inclusive language > guidelines for IETF technologies. The IETF has designated National > Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) "Guidance for NIST Staff > on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards" for its > inclusive language guidelines. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-03.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-03 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
