From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: 23 October 2023 14:36
Hi everyone, The co-authors and I have submitted a draft of service ID for addressing and networking to RTGWG and the chief motivation is to demonstrate and clarify why employing a standalone service ID matters significantly for multiple use cases with good benefits. The draft in the first place focuses on the standalone service ID in routing network though corresponding solution considerations have also been demonstrated as instantiation of how service ID could be utilized from perspective of end to end workflow. However, we would like to in the first stage address why, what and how in terms of service ID rather than a specific framework solution. Any comments, suggestions and contributions would be welcome and appreciated. <tp> The RFC Editor currently lists seven possible expansions for 'sid' none of which is sufficiently well known to not need expanding when used. You are adding number eight. It might help readers, perhaps the IETF at large, if another abbreviation could be found. Tom Petch The draft link: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking/>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking/ Best regards, Daniel Huang 黄光平 huangguangping 标准团队/有线规划部 Wireline architecture team./Wireline Product R&D Institute [cid:afc08a499f4d4614a09e37179ab78b10] [cid:24242e5637af428891c4db731e7765ad] 南京市雨花区软件大道50号中兴通讯2号楼 R&D Building, ZTE Corporation Software Road No.50, Yuhua District, Nanjing, P..R.China, 210012 M: +86 13770311052<tel:+86%2013770311052> E: [email protected] www.zte.com.cn<http://www.zte.com.cn/> Original From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: 黄程00315422;黄光平10039714;Dong Yang <[email protected]>;袁冬宇10335620;Fu Huakai;Ge Chen <[email protected]>;Jie Liang <[email protected]>;Yan Zhang <[email protected]>;郭勇10051305;gechen <[email protected]>; Date: 2023年10月23日 21:19 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking-00.txt A new version of Internet-Draft draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Daniel Huang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking Revision: 00 Title: Service ID for Addressing and Networking Date: 2023-10-23 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 26 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking-00.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking Abstract: More and more emerging applications have raised the demand for establishing networking connections?anywhere and anytime, alongside the availability of highly distributive?any-cloud services. Such a demand motivates the need to efficiently interconnect heterogeneous entities, e.g., different domains of network and cloud owned by different providers, with the goal of reducing cost, e.g., overheads and end-to-end latency, while ensuring the overall performance satisfies the requirements of the applications. Considering that different network domains and cloud providers may adopt different types of technologies, the key of interconnection and efficient coordination is to employ a unified interface that can be understood by heterogeneous parties which could derive the consistent requirements of the same service and treat the service traffic appropriately by their proprietary policies and technologies. Therefore, service ID is one promising candidate for the unified interface since it could be designed to be lightweight, secure, and enables fast and efficient packet treatment. Leveraging service ID, addressing and networking among heterogeneous network domains and cloud providers can be accomplished by establishing the mapping between the unified service ID and the specific technologies used by a network domain or a cloud provider. This document provides typical use cases of unified service ID for addressing and routing (SIAN), validating that interconnecting different network domains or cloud providers can be achieved at lower cost without sacrificing the performance of application compared with existing methods of which problems as well as gaps have also been illustrated. The requirements for SIAN are also derived for each of the scenarios. Finally, a framework solution is demonstrated. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
