Hi all, There is no response to this email, so the chairs assume that the WG is OK with the changes and the issue is considered closed.
The document will proceed with the publication process. Thanks, Yingzhen On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 10:19 AM Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > (with chair hat on) > > While draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend was in RFC editor queue, the > authors noticed that "tag" and "metric" of a route have been augmented by > the ietf-ospf module (RFC9129) and ietf-isis module (RFC9130). The authors > decided to add a constraint to the augmentation in the rib extension > module, so the augmentation is only applicable to routes not from OSPF or > IS-IS. Also the "attributes" grouping was removed since it's only used once > in the draft. > > The diff of changes is here: > Diff: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-22.txt - > draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-24.txt > <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-22&url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-24&difftype=--html> > > Please review the changes and respond to this email if you have any > questions or concerns. > > This will remain open until 10/27. > > Thanks, > Yingzhen >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
