No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers, Dan
From: rtgwg <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 1:23 PM To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [EXT]IPR call for draft-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa Hi, This is an IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa (draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-11 - Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa/>) There is an existing IPR disclosure: <IPR Details - Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa (ietf.org)<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/>> The authors and contributors please respond to this IPR call. Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. The WG Last Call will only start after all authors have sent in their IPR statements to the list. Thanks, Yingzhen
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
