John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for doing this work! I have a few small comments below, I hope they're helpful. ### Section 4.1 “The IPvX example above shows a Virtual Router configured to cover the IPv4 address owned by Router-1 (VRID=1, IPvX_Address=A)” Shouldn’t that be “IPvX” not “IPv4”? ### Section 6.4.3 Pretty nitty, the RFCEd would presumably catch this, and I’m puzzled how it would have happened, but “@ Discard ADVERTISEMENT” isn’t at the same indent level as all the other @ items (it should be one space further in). ### Section 8.2.4 “Additional configuration MAY be required in order for Unsolicited Neighbor Advertisements to update the corresponding neighbor cache.” Did you really intend the BCP 14-style MAY there? If so, OK, but it reads as though a lowercase “may” would do the job. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
