> On Jan 4, 2024, at 3:45 AM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-17: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In Section 2.5, there's this:
> 
> The Active Router SHOULD observe that this situation is occurring and log the 
> problem.
> 
> I understand "SHOULD log", but I don't understand "SHOULD observe".  How 
> about:
> 
> The Active Router SHOULD log the problem if it observes that this situation 
> is occurring.

Yes - that sounds better. 

Thanks,
Acee
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to