Hi Mohamed, Renato, Would it be possible to get a review of this BIS version of the VRRP YANG model? The main impetus of the BIS was to remove the non-inclusive language. However, we have the opportunity to make other changes including adding more operational state. I think it would be good to address the substantive YANG comments prior to the IESG Telechat for a change.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis/ Note that we agreed to remove the deprecated data nodes so that the non-inclusive language is removed in one RFC iteration as opposed to three. To date, no one has implemented the existing ietf-vrrp.yang model with the data-nodes that cannot be named, so that plan is to leave them or of the BIS version. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
