We have received responses from all the authors, and we can now proceed
with the WGLC.

Thanks,
Yingzhen



On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 8:12 PM Ravi Parikh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yingzhen and RTG WG,
>
> I am not aware of any IPR.
>
> Thank you,
> Ravi
>
> > On Dec 31, 2025, at 2:28 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yingzhen and RTG WG,
> >
> > I'm not aware of any IPR.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> >> On Dec 31, 2025, at 5:25 PM, Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In preparation for the WGLC of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis , we'd
> like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules.
> >>
> >> There is currently no IPPR disclosures of this draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis/
> >>
> >> Please state either:
> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >> or
> >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>
> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> >>
> >> If yes to the above, please state either:
> >>
> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> >> or
> >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >>
> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >> appropriate.
> >>
> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> >> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you
> >> are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the
> >> next stage until a response has been received from each author.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Yingzhen
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to