Hi all,
I support the adoption of this document. With the rapid development of
high-demand applications such as AI/ML training/inference and real-time
services, adaptive traffic manipulation (including TE, load balancing, and flow
control) has become indispensable for ensuring high throughput, low latency,
and lossless transmission. Therefore, modern networks are in urgent need of a
new set of fast network notification solutions to address the core challenges.
Regards,
Mengyao
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker"<[email protected]>;
Date: Fri, Jan 16, 2026 03:12 AM
To: "rtgwg"<[email protected]>; "rtgwg-chairs"<[email protected]>;
"draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement"<[email protected]>;
"fantel"<[email protected]>;
Subject: [fantel] Call for adoption:
draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 (Ends 2026-01-30)
【本邮件为外部邮件，请注意核实发件人身份，并谨慎处理邮件内容中的链接及附件】
This message starts a rtgwg WG Call for Adoption of:
draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03
This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-01-30
Abstract:
Modern networks require adaptive traffic manipulation including
Traffic Engineering (TE), load balancing, flow control, and
protection, to support high-throughput, low-latency, and lossless
applications such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) /Machine Learning
(ML) training and real-time services. A good and timely
understanding of network operational status, such as congestion and
failures, can help to improve network utilization, enable the
selection of paths with reduced latency, and enable faster response
to critical events. This document describes the existing
problems
and why a new set of fast network notification solutions are
needed.
Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
of this Internet-Draft by the rtgwg WG. Comments to explain your preference
are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
include this message in your response.
Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].
Thank you.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement/
There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03
_______________________________________________
fantel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
