Hi, I support the adoption of this document. With the increasing demand from customers for high-bandwidth and latency-sensitive applications such as LLM training and inference, operators need to provide latency-assured connectivity in WANs. Fast notification can be a useful solution, and this document provides a clear analysis and description of the issues around fast network notification.
Best Regards, Lijie Deng Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <[email protected]> 于2026年1月16日周五 03:12写道： > This message starts a rtgwg WG Call for Adoption of: > draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 > > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-01-30 > > Abstract: > Modern networks require adaptive traffic manipulation including > Traffic Engineering (TE), load balancing, flow control, and > protection, to support high-throughput, low-latency, and lossless > applications such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) /Machine Learning > (ML) training and real-time services. A good and timely > understanding of network operational status, such as congestion and > failures, can help to improve network utilization, enable the > selection of paths with reduced latency, and enable faster response > to critical events. This document describes the existing problems > and why a new set of fast network notification solutions are needed. > > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support > adoption > of this Internet-Draft by the rtgwg WG. Comments to explain your preference > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and > include this message in your response. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the > provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement/ > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
