Like Joel, I no longer object to working group adoption. The shortening and focusing of Section 5.2 is a welcome improvement.
Thanks, --David -----Original Message----- From: Joel Halpern <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 12:07 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [rtgwg] Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-05.txt [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Thank you. While I still have concerns about how we will address these problems, you have addressed my concerns and I do not object to working group adoption. Yours, Joel On 2/2/2026 11:17 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Happy to do that. > > Your comment about the ambiguity of "lossless" was addressed by the update of > version -04, in which "lossless" was removed and "low latency" was used > instead in describing the service requirements. > > Your comment about "issues such as very-low-loss delivery should be described > as potential results, not as goals of the work" is addressed by the new text > in the second last paragraph of the introduction. > > Your comment about "at the very least I would expect identification of > problem spaces with different characteristics, and possibly explicit > statements that they should be addressed with different techniques." is > addressed by the new text in the last paragraph of the introduction. > > Please let us know if they addressed your comments. > > Best regards, > Jie > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joel Halpern <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 11:20 PM >> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [rtgwg] FW: New Version Notification for >> draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-05.txt >> >> Can you please summarize for the list the changes you made to address my >> comments. I apparently missed the early proposal of resolutions. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Joel >> >> On 2/2/2026 10:11 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: >>> Dear WG, >>> >>> Version -05 of fantel problem statement is uploaded to address the >> comments received from Joel and Zafar, it also reflects the recent discussion >> among the coauthors. >>> Thanks again for all the comments and discussion. Further review and >> feedback are welcome. >>> Best regards, >>> Jie (on behalf of coauthors) >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 11:04 PM >>>> To: Francois Clad (editor) <[email protected]>; Dongjie (Jimmy) >>>> <[email protected]>; Luis M. Contreras >>>> <[email protected]>; Mike McBride (editor) >>>> <[email protected]>; DURMUS Mehmet >> <[email protected]>; >>>> Francois Clad <[email protected]>; Hao Lu <[email protected]>; >>>> Jeffrey Zhang <[email protected]>; Dongjie (Jimmy) >>>> <[email protected]>; Luis Contreras >>>> <[email protected]>; Mehmet Durmus >>>> <[email protected]>; Mike McBride >> <[email protected]>; >>>> Ran Pang <[email protected]>; Reshad Rahman >> <[email protected]>; >>>> Rui Zhuang <[email protected]>; Xiaohu Xu >>>> <[email protected]>; Yadong Liu <[email protected]>; >>>> Yongqing Zhu <[email protected]>; Zhaohui Zhang >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: New Version Notification for >>>> draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-05.txt >>>> >>>> A new version of Internet-Draft >>>> draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-05.txt >>>> has been successfully submitted by Jie Dong (editor) and posted to >>>> the IETF repository. >>>> >>>> Name: draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement >>>> Revision: 05 >>>> Title: Fast Network Notifications Problem Statement >>>> Date: 2026-02-02 >>>> Group: rtgwg >>>> Pages: 15 >>>> URL: >>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-0 >>>> 5.txt >>>> Status: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement/ >>>> HTMLized: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-fantel-problem-state >>>> ment >>>> Diff: >>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dong-fantel-problem-s >>>> tatement- >>>> 05 >>>> >>>> Abstract: >>>> >>>> Modern network applications, ranging from Artificial Intelligence >>>> (AI) /Machine Learning (ML) training to large-scale cloud services, >>>> require adaptive networks to ensure reliable and congestion-free data >>>> transfer within or across multiple data centers. A good and timely >>>> understanding of network operational status can help to enable faster >>>> response to critical events, so as to enable the selection of paths >>>> with reduced latency and improve network utilization. This >> document >>>> describes the existing problems and the need of fast network >>>> notification solutions. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
