Sarbajit : My impression about you has undergone a tremendous change - for the better - after you have been able to win this longest running RTI battle . Any other mortal would have gone down under the circumstances .
As for the bomb that you mentioned - please spare the good ones at the CIC and courier it to Urvashi in Lucknow . She will put it o a better use (: Dr Arun Agrawal Noida ________________________________ From: sarbajitr <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, 27 November, 2009 20:31:26 Subject: [rti_india] Re: Delhi High Court quashes RTI Act,CIC Management Regulations 2007 Dear Arun /Sidharth 1) Sorry, thnx for correcting the AD slip - BTW I don't track her decisions except to note that she has been constantly improving. There has been some tension in CIC after news leaked that IC(SG) is now back in the running for the PCRF best IC award. Alert readers will note that IC(SG) did not subscribe to the CIC's condemnation of PCRF /awards. http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Minutes/ Minutes24112009. pdf 2) Cancellation of the CIC Mangement regulations does not automatically mean all 10 must sit together. Unfortunately the CIC never asks for my legal opinion (they cant afford me). However, if the CIC doesn't behave after the court's order (ie. function strictly in terms of RTI Act and DoPT Rules) I am now uniquely placed to file contempt petitions (my true calling in life) against them individually. I think I shall start with that 7(3) order where the 4 member "bench" refused to go into my forceful submission that they were sitting illegaly. --- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, "Arun" <arun_agrawal@ ...> wrote: > > > The correct name is Ms Annapurna Dxit . And BTW, IC(SG) has lunch in > IC(AD)'s room as > > far as I know . > > , Sidharth <sidharthbbsr@ > wrote: > > > > Dear Sarbajit, > > > > I wonder what kind of 'Khichdi' decision will come out of CIC when TEN > > of India's most 'eminent' personalities shit together and dish out > > their decisions. > > > > BTW any plans to write your own memoirs on India's longest running RTI > battle ? > > > > Sidharth Misra > > > > P.S. Is that Anupama or Annapurna ? I am still confused. > > > > http://bit.ly/ 54zaMA > > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, sarbajit roy > > mail.sarbajitroy@ wrote: > > > Dear Sidharth > > > > > > Not sure if this is true. The CIC put up a spirited defence before > > > their Lordships and may yet carry the day for Mr Habibullah. > > > > > > In any case how does it matter of the CIC Management Regulations > > > do get (s)quashed. There are many benefits > > > > > > 1) We will not have to submit 4 copies of our plaints > > > > > > 2) We will be able to file in all the Indian languages (not only > > > in English / Hindi) > > > > > > 3) We will not have to visit CIC anymore - because our cases > > > will only come up after 20 years. > > > > > > 4) We will need just 1 bomb to blow them all up when they sit > > > together. > > > > > > 5) CIC won't work at all because Shailesh Gandhi will not sit in > > > the same room as Anupama Dixit. Or is it the other way around? > > > > > > Sarbajit > > > > > > On 11/27/09, Sidharth sidharthbbsr@ wrote: > > >> Delhi High Court quashes RTI Act,CIC Management Regulations 2007 > > >> > > >> A division bench of the Delhi High Court today quashed the Central > > >> Information Commission (Management) Regulations 2007 in case of > > >> Er.Sarbajit Roy v. DDA. All Central RTI appeals will now be heard > by > > >> all 10 Information Commissions jointly. > > >> > > >
