Hi Anais, I am travelling so I cannot review your images, but please check if the following applies to you: Open issue: https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/issues/151 Related thread: https://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/2018-February/010575.html
Regards, Chao 2018-04-11 15:37 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I'm reconstructing a homogeneous cylinder. My problem is that I have > better results for 180 projections, than for 360 for SART (with default > parameters), and the same geometry (except the number of projections). > > I don't understand why adding projections adds more errors, since it > should be better (and for other algorithms this is indeed better with 360 > projections). > > With 180 projections, the mean error on the cylinder is 1,6% , and the > maximal error is 21,6%. While, with 360 projections, on the cylinder the > mean error is 6,4%, and the maximal error is 169%. > Even if I don't take into account voxels close to edges, there are more > errors with 360 projections. > > Is there a reason why I obtain worse results with 360 projections? > > Since my files are too big, I added them here https://drive.google.com/ > drive/folders/1AYumjqNGUr8DZ0kxIbF7Ab1xet7srk-z?usp=sharing. I also added > a file with the commands I used. > > > Thank you very much. > > Anaïs > _______________________________________________ > Rtk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users >
_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list [email protected] https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
